Latest outputs
Bring digital twins back to Earth
A group of eleven experts from various fields (including Dr Arnald Puy from the University of Birmingham) join forces to criticize the creation of a digital twin (DT) of the Earth, including its oceans, atmosphere, biosphere, and human inhabitants. They argue that while DTs aim to integrate data from various sources to aid decision-making, the project has significant flaws and is a poor use of resources. Check the link below for more information.
Are we under a global water crisis?
Arnald Puy and Bruce Lankford critically review the Global Commission on the Economics of Water's claim that society has crossed the upper planetary boundary for water, leading to a global water crisis. Through sensitivity auditing and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis, they suggest that this claim stems from a sweeping narrative marked by disregard for uncertainty and the production of fragile numbers.
Paper out in Technometrics
Arnald Puy, Pamphile Roy and Andrea Saltelli propose a simple, easy to understand and computationally efficient approach for global sensitivity analysis based on the concept of discrepancy (the deviation of the distribution of points in a multi-dimensional space from the uniform distribution). The contribution provides modellers with a straightforward tool to conduct global sensitivity analysis.
Book chapter on model hubris in Oxford University Press
Arnald Puy and Andrea Saltelli reflect on the philosophical foundations that ground the quest towards ever more detailed models, and identify four practical dangers derived from this pursuit: an explosion of the model’s uncertainty space, model black-boxing, computational exhaustion, and model attachment. The book is edited by Andrea Saltelli and Monica Di Fiore and is published by Oxford University Press.
Paper out in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
In this Comment, Arnald Puy, Michela Massimi, Bruce Lankford and Andrea Saltelli discuss three epistemological obstacles that prevent irrigation models from providing accurate and "objective" estimates: the models’ elusive tie to reality, model plurality and indeterminacy of the target system.
DAWN's proof of concept: the delusive accuracy of irrigation water withdrawal estimates
Several modellers, irrigation scientists and experts in uncertainty show in Nature Communications that previous studies on global irrigation water withdrawals might have missed uncertainties spanning two orders of magnitude already at the grid cell level. Current estimates thus present us with a mirage of accuracy.